#


ABSTRACT

Instruments are calibrated, and then reliable test results will be obtained ? Are there simple and effective tools to keep test instruments well performed, especially for physical test? (e.g. ICI pilling, Martindale, random pilling and tensile...) Moreover, many factors affect the performance of tests. Therefore, working with SDC Enterprises (SDC) and all the leading independent textile/softlines testing labs, KMS adopts SDC Verification Fabrics, as the reference, to effectively monitor test, well as a whole. In so doing, if different test instruments pass through the verification regularly, even though they are operated in different situations (e.g. by different lab technicians...), reliable test results can be obtained.


INTRODUCTION

Organisations involved in textile testing show great concern with regards to the reliability, precision and accuracy of their laboratory equipment. Equipment used in the physical test area, for determining important properties such as tensile, bursting, tearing strengths, resistance to abrasion and propensity to pilling, are heavily reliant on external service and calibration. Invariably this facility is provided by engineers of the machinery manufacturer, performed by trained professional mechanics, using specialised tools and test materials.
In general, force or pressure, speed, distance, current or voltage, energy etc. are the calibration criteria of physical testing machines. This approach is perceived to leave shortcomings, gaps and voids:

1) Only trained professionals can check and calibrate the machines; needless to say, this can be a costly exercise.
2) Servicing and calibration may only take place quarterly or even annually in some occasions. Changes in the working environment and/or equipment between these calibration intervals may be hard to detect, and subsequently influence the reliability of the test data.
3) From the standpoint of the physical testing laboratory,

use for the calibration of a machine's performance, the actual test results generatede are the ultimate goal.

There are few specific international standards, which call for the use of reference materials to be used in conjunction with /or materials, e.g. Multi-fibre fabric and blue wool standards.However, many international standards, in particular " physical" test method it methods do not include the use of a the standard refference material to verify the condition of the apparatus being used ,and therefore validity of the result obtained


SDC Enterprises have combined their extensive knowledge of fabric quality control, textile testing, dyeing and continuity of technical performance in test materials to develop a range of verification fabrics to improve the controls available to organisations involved in textile testing. Use of these fabrics will provide a simple and effective way to implement verification or control procedures for their testing.



METHOD

The purpose of this study was to explore the use of SDCE's Verification Fabrics in the performance analysis of laboratory equipment. This study focuses on SDCE Verification Fabric #2955 and #2960, the chosen International Standard, and utilises six physical testing machines. This study was conducted at intervals throughout the day/week, using a diverse operating team, bringing an element of subjectivity to the exercise.



PRINCIPLES

(A) Consistent textile materials to be used for the performance analysis:-
1) Woven, Plain-Weave, Product code 2955 Verification Fabric PH 2) Knitted, Product code 2960 Verification Fabric PI

(B) Test equipment designated for the exercise:-
1) Tensile strength tester, code UST
2) Martindale abrasion and pilling tester, code MTD
3) Bursting strength tester, code BTA
4) Electronic tearing tester, code ELT
5) Random tumble pilling tester, code RPT
6) ICI pilling tester, code ICI

(C) The test pieces will be subjected to the following International Standard Test Methods:
1) Determination of Maximum Force using the Grab Method: ISO 13934-2
2) (a) Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics: ASTM D4966, Option 3 (% mass loss)
(b) Determination of Fabric Propensity to Surface Fuzzing and to Pilling: ISO 12945-2
3) Hydraulic Bursting Strength of Textile Fabrics: ASTM D3786
4) Tearing Strength of Fabrics by Falling-Pendulum Type (Elmendorf): ASTM D1424
5) Determination of Fabric Propensity to Surface Fuzzing and to Pilling: ASTM D3512
6) Determination of Fabric Propensity to Surface Fuzzing and to Pilling: ISO 12945-1

image
image


Disscussion

The importance of selecting the correct fabric for use in performance analysis.

A) Burst strength tester, BTA:-

For the analysis of the burst strength tester, an internationally standardized aluminium foil is used. Aluminium foil is used, due to its rigid nature, to help inspect the mechanical aspect of the testing apparatus. The use of aluminium foil, although with its own merits, does not necessarily reflect the actual situation in textile fabric testing. Factors like an ageing or unsuitable diaphragm, oil leakage, insufficient hydraulic fluid, incorrect tightness of sample holder can lead to favourable aluminium foil data but undesirable deviations in textile fabric testing. Use of a knitted verification fabric, can be an additional safeguard when determining the reliability of the machine.

Experence has shown us that sourcing of a repeatable fabric,giving a small range of deviated results,may be difficult. ed results, may be difficult. This is where SDCE's #2960 Fabric fits perfectly.The study of SDC verification Fabric #2960 shows that in conducting more than one hundred tests a high consistency found ,with coefficient of variations below 5%. This proves the repeatability gives users the confidence to use the Verification fabric and Designate any large deviation in results as either apparatus faults or operational error.



B) Martindale abrasion and pilling tester, MTD:-

Use of a Verification Fabric in performance analysis is twofold.

Firstly, analysis calls for visual assessment, which is subjective, requiring technical experience as well as grading materials for reference. There is no doubt that greater experience and expertise in visual assessment lends itself to a more reliable end result. The inclusion of photographic grading references in test methods is designed to aid the less experienced technician towards achieving the correct result. Use of SDCE's #2960 Verification Fabric provides a tangible addition to aid technicians in making grading judgements, therefore improving accuracy of result obtained.

Secondly, the demonstrated repeatability of SDCE Verification Fabric means that users the confidence to use the Verification Fabric and designate any large deviation in results as either apparatus faults or operational error.


c) Tear Tester, ELT:-

In a conventional Elmendorf tester, inaccuracies can be caused by the tightness or looseness of the pointer, variation or ageing calibration weights of the machine itself, the physical wear the machine exhibits and the performance of the blade and clamps. When electronics come into play, calibration methods vary, and are heavily dependent on the manufacturer's design. In order for the user to establish the creation of true results and the reliability of the machines performance, a consistent verification fabric is required.

The study of SDC Verification Fabric #2955 shows a high consistency results, with coefficient of variations below 5%. The proved performance of #2955 gives users the confidence, when using the Verification Fabric, to designate any large deviation in results as either apparatus faults or operational error.


D) Tensile Strength Tester, UST

There are many test variable associated with tensile machines, such as load cell range, gauge length, test speed and style of jaw and clamp. Also, there are several different types of test and related specimen preparation, loop, strip and grab are stipulated by international standard organizations.

This test variety makes it difficult for users to easily identify the potential cause of deviations at these machines. Is it the machine itself, or the operation, or use of inappropriate accessories? Use of a consistent, reliable Verification Fabric to test for conformity on a weekly/daily basis, or whenever any deviations occur, means they can rule out the calibration. factor of the machine itself. This will allow the user to focus on the procedure of the test method in question and the accessories in use, eliminating wasted time exploring wrong avenues, such as time spent in consultation with the machine manufacturer.

Based on test method ISO 13934-2, we ran up to a hundred tests on SDC Verification Fabric #2955 with our universal tensile strength testers UST of different serial numbers, results are consistent, with coefficient of variations belows settings or most results lie within ±1 standard deviation.


E) Martindale Abrasion Tester, MTD:-

No matter how fine and precise the adjustments are being carried out by mechanical engineers, both ASTM D4966 and ISO 12947-2 test methods mention the imprecise nature of the Martindale Abrasion Test. The inexact character is due to subjective operator techniques, combined with the potential inconsistencies found within textile constructions fibre types. A supply of a suitable, consistent Verification Fabric will aid users to monitor their test results.

The study of SDC Verification Fabric #2955 shows that when using ASTM D4966 test method, Evaluation Option 3, that after a fixed number of rubs, a reasonable range of % mass loss can be determined, therefore, any large deviation in result can be allocated to either apparatus faults or operational error.

image
image

Result Guidlines
image image image


image
image


SUMMARY

The study not only proved the designed repeatability of SDCE Verification but also highlighted the advantages to be gained through their use, with regards to quality control and operational efficiencies.

Use of SDCE Verification Fabrics will provide a simple and effective way for laboratories, either test houses manufacturers in-house facilities, to implement verification or

control procedures for their testing. The verification of the consistency of lab results can be assessed, over time, or between labs, technicians and pieces of equipment. The range can also be a useful addition to the assessment and training of technicians, or they can be used as control fabrics to ensure test procedures are conducted correctly or equipment is performing as expected.